



|
PROMISES
AND PERILS OF WEBLOGISTAN:
ONLINE PERSONAL JOURNALS AND THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Liora Hendelman-Baavur*
Since
the establishment of the Islamic Republic in 1979, Iranian
printed and broadcast
media has been strongly controlled
by the state. However, the state's authority has been compromised
due to online publishing and the free flow of information,
especially through "Weblogistan"--the Iranian cyber-sphere
of online self-publishing journals. This has generated much
concern among the Islamic Republic authorities. Along with
satellite television and mobile phones, weblogs have irretrievably
changed the way people in the entire Middle
East interact with one another and with the rest of the world.
The Islamic Republic of Iran's ways of coping with challenges
posed by the internet in general and weblogs in particular
are especially intriguing, considering that the most famous
blogger in the country is the current president, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad.
When three
students--Salman Jariri, Hossein Derakhshan, and
Nima Afshar Naderi--published the first three Iranian weblogs
(or blogs) in late 2001, they were not aware that this was
actually the birth of Weblogistan. Two years later, in 2003,
Iranian Weblogistan was the fastest growing cyber-sphere in
the Middle East, and it became a prominent
feature in defining the new global phenomenon of online communities.
Estimates for 2006 rank Iran ninth
in the world for the number of weblogs, and Persian is among
the top ten languages in terms of posting volume.[1] The Persian Weblog Service Provider (WSP) reports
hosting over 180,000 registered weblogs, and the WSP Blogfa
records traffic of over two million visitors a day.[2] According to Mahdi Boutorabi, managing director
of PersianBlog, their service hosts the largest Iranian online
community, with over 670,000 listed users.[3]
This paper tracks major characteristics of Iranian Weblogistan,
points to the challenges it has posed to the Islamic Republic
of Iran, and assesses ways in which the authorities have confronted
them thus far.[4] It
is important to note that from the outset, the bulk of internet
challenges the Islamic Republic is facing
(cyber-crimes, sedition, disinformation
and imbalanced reporting, harassment, defamatory, hateful,
obscene and immoral content, and other aspects to be discussed
further) are not at all unique to the Iranian case and could
apply to other countries as well. In setting up an advanced
telecommunications infrastructure, each state chooses its own
strategy for managing new information and communications technology.
Yet the loss of the stranglehold over the flow of information
reaching its populace and the emergence of an uncontrolled
public sphere, such as Weblogistan, pose additional challenges
for regimes in China, Egypt, North Korea, Syria, Tunisia, and
Iran--which all appear on the Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF)
list of the "15 enemies of the Internet."[5]
WHAT
IS A WEBLOG?
The
term "weblog" (or
blog for short) was scarcely familiar prior to 1999. Yet
since then, weblogs have become
the building blocks of one of the most vibrant virtual communities.[6] According to Nasrin Alavi, a weblog
is "a
kind of diary or journal posted on the internet."[7] Alireza
Doostdar defines a weblog as "a website consisting of
regularly updated writings arranged in reverse chronological
order, usually by a single author."[8] A
more complex definition is offered by Erin Simmons, who defines
it as "a hyperlink-driven site containing
a mixture of hyperlinks, commentary, personal thoughts and
essays."[9] Dan Gilmore identifies a chain of online communications
(email lists, forums, chat rooms, news groups, etc.) and categorizes
weblogs somewhere in between the web and emails. He emphasizes
that blogs also "link to other websites and weblog postings
and many [bloggers] allow readers to comment on the original
posts, thereby allowing audience discussions."[10]
In its April 2007 State of the Live Web updated
quarterly report, the Technorati search engine tracked over 70 million weblogs.
It further estimated that approximately 120,000 new weblogs
are created everyday.[11] Notwithstanding
these high figures, weblogs are also abandoned at the same
rate that they are created. Some commentators even contend
that the life expectancy of an average weblog equals that of
a fruit fly.[12] The ultra-rapid growth of this virtual global
village--known by now as the blogosphere, blogtopia, blogomania,
blogalization, and Weblogistan--make the process of tracking
weblogs, especially those that are active, a highly challenging
endeavor.[13] Although weblogs tend to share a basic format--a
template, a headline, an archive arranged in reverse chronological
order, blogrolls, and so forth--the dynamic evolution of this
new medium has presented new methodological difficulties for
research and typology. The implementation of advanced blogging
tools, which improve both managing and presentation features,
have already initiated the emergence of different types of
weblogs (photo, video, and life weblogs, for example). In turn,
online communication patterns are also being altered. As the
blogosphere continues to flourish and evolve, the definition
of what exactly constitutes a weblog has also become more complicated.
Many personal websites have adopted weblog applications or
are produced with weblogging software, thus it is difficult
to discern them from true weblogs.
THE
WEBLOGISTAN FRONTIER
Exploring
the relationship between technology and online behavior,
Quentin Jones suggests
that the community's cyberspace
is a socially produced "virtual settlement." Drawing
on archaeological methodology and practices, Jones identifies
four preliminary characteristics of the virtual settlement:
interactivity, a variety of communicators, sustained membership,
and a virtual common public space. Jones further stipulates
that a virtual settlement is "symbolically delineated
by topic of interest within which a significant proportion
of interrelated computer-mediated communications occur."[14] Referring
specifically to the blogosphere, Steve Fox defines it as "the new imagined community," inspired
by Benedict Anderson's well known book, which focuses on the
creation and the sustainability of the modern nation.[15] Identifying
the cyber-sphere as a metropolis, Michael Hauben observes the
developing sense of responsibility
shared by what he has termed "Netizens:"
There are people online who actively contribute towards the development of the Net. These people understand the value of collective work and the communal aspects of public communications. These are the people who discuss and debate topics in a constructive manner, who e-mail answers to people and provide help to new-comers, who maintain FAQ files and other public information repositories, who maintain mailing lists, and so on. These are people who discuss the nature and role of this new communications medium. These are the people who as citizens of the Net, I realized were Netizens.[16]
In this light, Iranian Weblogistan can be defined along two
dimensions. According to the first dimension, Weblogistan is
comprised of various virtual settlements in cyberspace, which
are delineated according to technical boundaries set by international
and Persian WSPs. The second dimension involves Iranian personal
weblogs written in the form of diaries by netizens or bloggers
(the term used to describe the authors of weblogs) who share
a sense of community and belong to one or more of the following
groups. The first group in current Weblogistan includes personal
weblogs written in Persian by bloggers who are permanent residents
of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The second group consists
of personal weblogs published by Iranians residing outside
the Islamic Republic, the bulk of whom are from North America
and Western Europe. A third group contains
personal weblogs published by Iranians in languages other than
Persian (mainly English, French, Urdu, and Arabic), in another
language in addition to Persian, or in many different languages.
A fourth group comprises weblogs published in Persian by Kurdish,
Afghani, and Tajik bloggers. A fifth group includes multilingual
weblogs by scholars, specialists, analysts, and readers of
different ethnic identities who are interested professionally
or otherwise in different issues pertaining to Iran and who
dedicate their weblogs to the subject. A sixth group consists
of non-individual weblogs, such group blogs, news blogs, and
corporate blogs.
There are numerous variations of these virtual Weblogistan
settlements. Some include writers both inside and outside of Iran.
For example, groups three, four, and five might include both
residents and non-residents of the Islamic Republic. Weblogs
also cover a wide array of topics and interests. Additional
subcategories in current Weblogistan
might include different types of weblogs.
The variety of groups comprising Weblogistan serve as an
indication of its extensive social boundaries. Since 2001,
Weblogistan has developed at a formidable pace and has attained
widespread popularity. Although its origins may be found in
Western countries and technologies, it is the joining of bloggers
from Iran that
has given Weblogistan its edge.
THE RISE OF WEBLOGISTAN--A BRIEF
BACKGROUND
Weblogistan surfaced in the Islamic Republic against the
backdrop of tangible transformations during Mohammad Khatami's
presidency (1997-2005). This period witnessed growing investments
in the local telecommunications infrastructure, which was promoted
by the government and increased availability of relatively
low-cost computers from East Asia. This
was followed by a proliferation of internet service providers
(ISPs), the rapid expansion of the internet, and improved access
technologies, especially in the major urban centers.[17] Exponentially,
growth was indicated by domestic usage and public access points,
such as in universities, research centers, libraries, and internet
cafes.[18] From 1999 to 2006, local usage of the internet
rose from an estimated 250,000 users to 11.2 million. As of
this writing, the Islamic Republic continues to rank as the
country with highest percentage of internet users (38.6 percent)
in the entire Middle East (second is Israel with 19 percent,
followed by Saudi Arabia with 13.1 percent),[19] and the Telecommunication Company of Iran (TCI)
has forecasted 25 million internet users in the country by
2009.[20]
Further
technological advancements during late 1990s and early 2000s
were central
to the rise of Weblogistan. Most notably
in this respect were the international incorporation of the
Unicode system--which supports Persian fonts--and the launching
of the first provider of free webpages and publishing tools
in Persian. PersianBlog commenced operation by hosting Persian
weblog tools in June 2002. It was followed by other weblog
services such as BlogFa, Mihanblog, Blogsky, and Parsiblog,
which were launched
during the course of 2004. The Persian weblog hosts, similar
to the international prototypes (published in English), offered
free service accompanied by easy-to-use software. Henceforth,
internet accessibility and basic computer skills were all that
were required for rapid self-publishing in Persian on the World
Wide Web.
News of Weblogistan
swiftly spread throughout the Islamic Republic by old and
new forms of mass media. Rumors, instructions,
and invitations to join the blogosphere passed by word of mouth,
email, newsgroups, and even graffiti of URLs (Uniform Resource
Locators) on
street walls, postboxes, and bus seats.
In addition to
the results of a decade of war with Iraq, a troubled economy,
and
massive waves of immigration to and from Iran, the late 1990s
were also marked by the Second of Khordad reform movement (the
local date of Khatami's election in 1997) and an atmosphere
seemingly hospitable to change. Azadeh Moaveni, the Time Magazine reporter
in Tehran, observed in her memoir how "young
people were busy launching weblogs… intellectuals were writing
innovative, sparkling satire, graphic designers were creating
websites for the west. Their interest was turning intensely
outward, to the world of ideas outside."[21] Ongoing factional political disputes regarding
the extent of the state's control over mainstream media became
more overt among senior officials of the Islamic Republic.[22] Promises
of greater freedom of the press also appeared in Khatami's
preliminary election manifesto, but eventually amounted to
recurrent crackdowns on local newspapers, especially during
his second term in office. From April 2000 to April 2001 the
authorities closed down more than 57 newspapers and publications
(most of which were pro-reform), leaving approximately 1,500
press industry workers, including journalists, unemployed.[23] Under such circumstances, Iranian writers and
journalists diverted their activity from printed to electronic
media and joined other netizens in Weblogistan.
The sense
of revitalization encouraged both individuals and social
groups to retest the
limits of the state's forbearance.
With 40 percent of Iran's population (in 2007, estimated at
around 68.5 million) between the ages of 15 and 35--the most
active age group of net users and bloggers--the country's unique
demography has contributed to the high receptiveness of the
new cyber-sphere activity.[24] The option to choose what personal details to
reveal online as well as the ability to publish anonymously
under pseudonyms, aliases, and even invented identities granted
rights such as freedom of expression and freedom of information,
which had previously been restricted.
Young
and ordinary citizens from across the country have articulated
their sense
of self, grievances, spontaneous thoughts,
casual ideas, and intuitive emotions in public. Referring to
the active and open debates that transpired in Weblogistan,
Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance Hossein Saffar-Harandi,
stated that such conditions allowed everyone to "comment
on current affairs as if he or she were president."[25] As
bloggers were drawn to Weblogistan for various reasons (curiosity,
experimentation, influence of others, entertainment,
etc.), the weblog was initially based on the guiding principal
of traditional personal journals, that is, self-documentation.
For instance, in his blog's introduction a 27-year-old blogger
writes: "I am just an ordinary simple Iranian boy who
wants to share his thoughts, beliefs, favorite [issues], country,
society…." In a different blog, a 31-year-old oil industrial
worker shares his daily experiences and his hobby of photography.
A Tehran-based English teacher shares her experiences as a
young single woman and human rights activist in her weblog;
and in yet another blog, a professor of social science shares
his thoughts on Islam and Iran.
Iranian Weblogistan has continued to proliferate as weblogs
have begun discussing myriad topics, including for example:
sports, health and hygiene, lifestyle, caricatures and jokes,
and current affairs. Data collected during October 2006 from
four of the major Persian weblog hosts (PersianBlog, BlogFa,
Mihanblog, and Parsiblog) indicate a subtotal of 178,957 weblogs
classified by subject.[26] Traffic rankings by Alexa also reveal that 87
percent of all users of these specific hosts originate from Iran and
the rest are from countries with high rates of Iranian immigrants
(the United Arab Emirates, Canada,
the United States, Sweden, and Germany).[27] Although these figures change constantly, 500-600
new weblogs are added daily to PersianBlog alone.[28] The following diagram indicates the major tendencies
of Iranian-based weblog topics as: daily family life (29 percent),
culture (19 percent), computer technology (17 percent), and
personal experiences (13 percent).

It
comes as no surprise that the sensitive category of "politics" is
not included in the list of categories that bloggers define
as subjects of their weblogs. It would be wrong to assume
that politics is not a major topic in Weblogistan. Despite
the risks
involved, highly opinionated and frequently well-informed
Iranian-based bloggers also comment on domestic and international
politics.
Debates on political affairs are especially high during times
of national crisis, such as the December 2003 earthquake
in Bam, the 2006 nuclear row, and local and national elections
(in 2004 for the Majlis, in 2005 for the presidency, and
in
2006 for municipalities and the Assembly of Experts). Thus, weblog connectivity has also enabled interactions and
collective networking among like-minded savvy net users as
well as the discussion of topics of mutual interest worldwide.
Sharing ideas and opinions, technological knowledge, and audio-visual
files have also become central features of Weblogistan. Online
collaborations are also manifested in group blogs, maintained
by several authors. For instance, students at the Sharif University
of Technology tend to use weblogs as a forum for conversations,
community forums, and discussion groups. Another interesting
example is the unofficial Iranian cultural documentation of
visual street arts weblog, where young artists document and
display graffiti, urban signs, and stickers in support of underground
artists living in Iran.
Hitherto, the circumstances that cultivated Weblogistan and
its considerable growth in the Islamic Republic have been outlined.
This background highlights some of the major challenges Weblogistan
has posed to the Islamic Republic in recent years. By facilitating
worldwide interactions and national collaborations, Weblogistan
has been compromising many of the country's social and political
restrictions.
THE CHALLENGES OF WEBLOGISTAN
Emerging as an integral part of the international blogosphere,
Weblogistan has developed into a global space that does not
abide by any standards of ethics or practices. Since the Islamic
Republic has been promoting public internet use, in particular
from the mid-1990s, Weblogistan was initially allowed to develop
without any serious restrictions by the authorities.[29] As such, weblogs manifest potential hazards to
expression and behavioral taboos that have prevailed in the
country ever since the establishment of the Islamic Republic.
By cutting across age, class, ethnic, and geopolitical boundaries,
the internet in general and weblog connectivity in particular
have been loosening some of the state's fundamental perceptions
concerning social order and its sex segregation policies. Free
and anonymous expression mediated by computers and practiced
in the privacy of one's home (or an isolated computer station)
has also enabled the dismantling of social and physical restraints.
The unedited, and informal nature of weblogs has turned them
into a source of empowerment for Iranian youth and especially
for Iranian women. It enables them to access critical information
(such as health and law), form online communities, gain social
support, and experience mixed gender interactions. Ever since
the early 1980s, the Islamic Republic has displayed sheer consistency
in enforcing sex segregation measures. The most conspicuous
forms are the compulsory chador (veil) for women and
routine moral patrols clamping down on parks, restaurants,
and other public places where young couples tend to group.
Indeed, moral concerns over indecent and subversive internet
content are not exclusive to the Islamic Republic,[30] yet they have been especially troubling for states
such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, which restrict interaction between
men and women who are not related.[31]
Beyond
redefining personal connectivity in the Islamic Republic,
Weblogistan
has also been an outlet through which unmonitored
contents have made their way into the country. The free flow
of information, along with foreign cultural invasion--mainly
from the United States--has slowly diminished the cultural
isolation imposed on the local population by the state. All
the more so, this flow of information stands in contradiction
to the Islamic Republic's doctrine. On the one hand, it has
contested the propagation of proper Islamic and revolutionary
values. On the other hand, it has challenged the campaign against
the Anglo-American cultural onslaught, or "Westoxication" (gharbzadegi).
Thus, while satellite television dishes and Western movies
were confiscated, Iranian-based bloggers were discussing Harry
Potter, Nicole Kidman, and Beyoncé.[32] The breach opened by Weblogistan also managed
to bypass the state's traditional controls over the mainstream
media (MSM) and its monopoly over the telecommunications market
(until 2006).[33]
No less troubling for the Islamic Republic has been the free
flow of information coming out of the country. Soon after they
began to multiply in 2002, Iranian personal weblogs managed
to attract the attention of the international MSM, and a new
kind of grassroots reporting and participatory journalism was
born. Weblogs published by Iranian resident citizens and firsthand
observers commenting on the happenings in Iran were gaining
recognition, especially by the Western media, as supplementary
or alternative sources to the Islamic Republic's official news
outlets. A notable case
in point was the coverage of the June 2003 demonstration and
the launch of a solidarity campaign by bloggers worldwide in
support of Iranian students.
Weblogs proved highly beneficial,
especially in covering domestic policies that the authorities
had deliberately withheld from the national and international
public or that had been discarded as not newsworthy. Iranian-Kurdish
bloggers, for instance, were able to expose details of the
July 2005 clashes between the local Kurdish population and
the Iranian security forces in the town of Mahabad,
when no other news coverage was available.
Another notable weblog exposure captured on camera the violent
suppression of the June 12, 2006 women activists' protest in Tehran's Haft-e Tir Square. Female demonstrators and
male supporters were protesting against civic and labor discrimination,
such as the minimum legal age at which a person may be charged
and tried as an adult (currently it is nine for girls and 15
for boys), a woman's testimonial value in court (which currently
carries only half the weight of a man's), and equal parental
rights in child custody. The peaceful demonstration soon turned
violent when security forces began to spray-paint (a tactic
used in order to be able to identify the women protestors,
who are all veiled) and arrest demonstrators. Several hours
following the incident, photographs of the clash between the
protestors and armed policewomen were circulated through Weblogistan.
One of the photos, taken by Mansour Nasiri, even won the Kaveh
Golestan photojournalism award later that year, but the Ministry
of Culture banned it from being officially displayed in public.[34]
The extensive
coverage the phenomenon has received in the international
media raised
Weblogistan's status, and it came
to play a role in the international agenda of Western
MSM. Offering an alternative source of uncensored information
to foreign media set an additional challenge for the Islamic
Republic, as it compromised the country's international prestige,
especially in relation to human rights. Yet international attention
has also put Iranian-based bloggers in a tight spot. On the
one hand, weblogs have gained recognition as an important
forum for debate and a valuable source of information. Yet
on the other hand, they have become targets of government efforts
to limit freedom of expression.
Confronted with these challenges, the Islamic Republic began
to apply multiple measures, passing new laws and implementing
existing ones, and activating comprehensive internet filtering
and control-monitoring over Weblogistan, especially since 2003.
At first, the authorities vehemently denied claims of any filtering
activities, and even today Iranian officials rarely address
the actual extent of state censorship over internet use and
weblogs in particular. Yet online, the filtering of Weblogistan
is surprisingly transparent, and internet users are notified
(occasionally both in Persian and English) if a weblog is blocked.
CAMPAIGNING AGAINST WEBLOGISTAN
The April 2003 arrest of blogger, former journalist, and
film critic Sina Motallabi signaled that Weblogistan had aroused
the attention of the authorities in Iran.
Charged with threatening national security, Motallabi was released
the following month after posting a very high bail. His arrest
dissuaded other bloggers, and they removed past postings and
adopted self-censorship for fear of similar acts of retribution
by the authorities. Such concerns were soon realized, as Motallabi's
case was the first in a series of crackdowns on bloggers and
other internet dissidents.
In February 2004,
a proposed legislative article "on punishment
of crimes linked to the internet" was first introduced
as a supplementary addition to the country's press law. The
new article specified a prison sentence of one to three years
for publishing information considered a threat to national
security and five to 15 years for disclosing sensitive information
to foreign states or foreign organizations.[35] The article also specifies about 20 forms of
online violations, such as offenses against Islamic and revolutionary
values, Iran's leadership, top clerics, and Khomeini's
teachings. In the spirit of the law, the head of the judiciary,
Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, announced that "anyone
who disseminates information aimed at disturbing the public
mind through computer systems would face the consequences."[36] Later that year, the judiciary also set up a
special division to investigate and prosecute internet dissidents.
Further instructions were passed to all ISPs (internet service
providers) and ICPs (internet content providers) in the country
ordering them to close every proxy server port used to bypass
filtration.
Under this new legislative framework, more than 20 bloggers
and internet journalists, mostly in their early twenties, were
detained between August and November 2004.[37] Among them was Mojtaba Samienejad, a 27-year-old
student who was sentenced to two years imprisonment for "insulting
the Supreme Guide" and ten more months for inciting "immorality."[38] With the election of the new Majlis that year,
2004 witnessed perhaps the most disturbing clampdown on bloggers
and internet dissidents. The wave of arrests included Mahboubeh
Abbas-Gholizadeh, the editor of the women's rights journal Farzaneh,
and Fereshteh Ghazi of the daily Etemad. The two women
were accused (among others things) of endorsing democracy online
and of "immoral behavior." After being held in custody
for a couple of months, they were released on high bail, and
together with fellow blog-journalists Hanif Mazroi, Massoud
Ghoreishi, and Arash Naderpour filed a formal complaint for
being mistreated, tortured, and violently interrogated during
their detention. Following the appeal, the head of judiciary,
Shahroudi, ordered the formation of an internal investigation
committee to probe the bloggers' claims, and in December 2004
the group appeared before a special presidential committee.
During the course of the procedures, some of the bloggers reported
attempts to obstruct the investigation by the underlings of
the judge Saeed Mortazavi, Tehran's
general prosecutor.[39] By the time the special committee completed
the investigation and finished its report, a new government,
under Ahmadinejad, had come into office.[40]
Further state sanctions in the form of technical filtering
and blocking were also implemented on the Iranian cyber-sphere.
Iranian weblogs such as Faryad-e Beseda ("dawn
of freedom"), published by Najma Omidparvar, was "disabled
due to terms of service violation."[41] The blocking of Omidparvar's weblog followed
her arrest in March 2005. Based on evidence found on her confiscated
computer and CD ROMs, the Revolutionary Court in the city of Rafsanjan found her guilty of acting against the
regime by showing disrespect to former president Khatami on
her weblog. Omidparvar, pregnant at that time, was released
after 24 days, but her husband and co-blogger, Mohammad Reza
Nasab Abdolahi, was sentenced to six months imprisonment and
a heavy fine for insulting the state's leaders, expressing
anti-governmental propaganda, and working with foreign media.[42]
The responsibility for filtering indecent websites and weblogs
from outside the country, as well as regulating domestic internet
activity, was assigned to Iranian ISPs, which filter internet
content by using various commercial filterware products of
their choice. The implementation of different filtering software
has resulted, according to Nart Villeneuve, in a lack of standardization
in the contents blocked in the country.[43] Western filtering technology originally intended
to enable parental control and deny access to pornographic
sites is now used to block secret lists of immoral and politically
offensive sites in countries such Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan,
Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen, although every
country outlines its own filtering strategy.[44] Iranian ISPs failing to comply with the state's
filtering strategy face heavy penalties and the revocation
of their licenses.[45]
Yet these filtering policies have not always produced the
most efficient and sufficient results. First, this is due to
the advancing nature of online communication technology. Iranian-based
net users are offered technical assistance in the form of online
gateways for censored sites from outside the country. Second,
using filterware (or content filtering) sometimes hinders the
state's online projects as well. For instance, in October 2006, a special seminar was held on "Women and
the Internet in the Third Millennium." The seminar was sponsored
by the Women's Affairs Department of the Islamic Revolutionary
Guards Corp and received online coverage. For the potential
target audience in Iran, the official
announcement of this seminar was filtered because of an illicit
word. Since online searches for the word "women" may
generate "immoral" results (e.g. pornography), many of the
women's organizations and social NGOs in Iran are
filtered as well.[46] Nonetheless, these technical glitches have
not prevented the authorities from continuing to tighten their
control and filtering policies over the internet and Weblogistan.
The same month, the government added yet another restriction
by instructing all ADSL providers to limit private users and
internet cafes to a maximum connection speed of 128kps, thus
making data transmission and the downloading of large files--especially
of images and videos--very difficult. An additional article
was released by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance
ordering all websites and weblogs to officially register on
a special site that was designated for this purpose by January
1, 2007.[47]
Members of the religious establishment have also expressed
their discomfort with the entire phenomenon of internet use
and its devastating effects. In a lecture delivered to deputies
of the Political Department of the Islamic Guard Corps on February
15, 2006, the Grand Ayatollah Nasir Makarem-Shirazi (b. 1924)
stated that satellites and the internet were destructive to
the morality and belief tenets of the young generation in Iran
and that some of the publications were destructive tools in
the hands of the enemy. The specific nature of Ayatollah Makarem-Shirazi's
important message did not prevent it from being posted on his
personal website.[48]
COOPTING THE MEDIUM FOR THE MESSAGE
The Internet as a new digital medium already played a key
role in the May 1997 presidential election, when leading candidates
Mohammad Khatami and Speaker of Parliament Ali Akbar Nategh
Nuri formed official websites publishing their political platforms.
In 2003, Mohammad Ali Abtahi, vice president during Khatami's
second presidential term, was the first acting cabinet member
in the Islamic Republic to launch a personal weblog. Regardless
of Abtahi's failed attempts to convince the former president
to publish his own weblog, by the 2005 presidential elections,
blogs were incorporated into the local political campaigns.
Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's fans, for instance, endorsed
his presidential candidacy through several semi-official weblogs,
and Mostafa Moeen, professor of pediatrics and former minister,
met regularly with bloggers and began publishing his own journal
online.
Over
the course of two years, from 2003 to 2005, most of the country's
prominent
grand ayatollahs accumulated the new
digital technology into their routine public activity. By publishing
their biographical notes, speeches, written works, official
visits, and photo galleries, they established what became known
unofficially as the "Webatollah." Senior clerics--such
as Ali Husseini Khamene'i (b. 1939), the supreme leader; Abddolkarim
Mousavi Ardebili (b. 1926), the head of the judicial system
under Khomeini; and Mohammad Taqi Mesbah Yazdi (b. 1934), member
of the Assembly of Experts and also widely regarded as president
Ahmadinejad's mentor--initiated their personal multilingual
official personal websites managed by a board of advisors,
office staff, translators, and theology students.
Additional
special projects were also launched by other leading clerics.
Grand
Ayatollah Yousef Saane'i (b. 1927) hosted a
special chat room during the month of Ramadan. Internet users
were encouraged to raise questions for Saane'i regarding human
rights, religion, and women's rights during fixed hours of
the day.[49] By
supplying immediate and direct answers online to such questions
relating to permission to use contraceptives, to inquiring
whether or not looking at a non-Muslim woman's body parts is
lawful, and even asking for guidance in voting in presidential
elections, Saane'i and other Iranian senior ayatollahs have
been making themselves available and transparent to the public.
The abundant activity of Iranian leading clerics on the World
Wide Web should not come as a surprise. Modern technology played
a key role in mobilizing the popular movement of the 1979 revolution
against Mohammad Reza Shah. Khomeini's oppositional messages
and teachings made their way from his exile in France to
the people of Iran via
cassette tapes and fax machines, by now old fashioned communication
technologies.[50] This current online presence also bears the mark of the e-government
(or e-state) project under the framework of the TAKFA national
reform program.[51] The
general program, approved by the Iranian cabinet in 2002, was
designated to advance all governmental branch services to the
public via electronic channels. Further shifts to improve the
government's interactions with the business sector and public
organizations were initiated through e-commerce, e-banking,
and e-education. An initial budget of 100 million dollars was
approved by the Majlis for the program.[52]
Various forms of information and communication networks,
promoted in Iran ever
since the establishment of the Islamic Republic, have also
proved instrumental to the propagation and dissemination of
its Shi'a doctrine in other Islamic countries. The internet's
potential to reach millions all around the world was soon found
to be even more compelling and effective than radio and television.
Addressing this issue, Ali Akbar Javanfekr, Ahmadinejad's presidential
press advisor, announced that "government agencies are
setting up websites due to the shortcomings of traditional
news outlets."[53] Aalulbayt, the Global Information Center for Shi'ism, had already
been established by 1998. Under the supervision of Grand Ayatollah
Sistani's office, the center offers in-depth information in
30 different languages. Its main objective is spreading Shi'a
culture and interpretations via the internet, creating a direct
link between prominent theology scholars in Qom
and the public.
In
September 2006, Hojjatoleslam Hamid Shahriari, the secretary
general
of the
Information Dissemination Supreme Council (IDSC),
under the supervision of Ahmadinejad, also reported of the
council's plans to expand the presence of religious content
on the web for the public and of intentions to enforce the
morality code over weblogs. He further remarked that different
voices in cyberspace have their audiences, and it is necessary
to modify and improve these voices. Therefore, he added, "we
support weblogs, especially religious and Koranic ones, and
guide the rest." He further stipulated that by guiding "we
mean providing certain… advice and guidelines."[54]
Accordingly, Ahmadinejad also requested that the Ministry
of Communication and Information Technology (MCIT) design a
national computer network, as he considered the current network
insecure and precarious.[55] During a speech at the 13th Press
and News Agencies Fair, he stressed that the national press
did not include enough analysis and criticism, and "it is
quite difficult to analyze an event, given it should be treated
correctly…. Despite circulation and reducing budget, the media
personnel should not disregard their major responsibilities."[56] Three months following this declaration, he
confirmed weblogs to be important carriers of ideology and
state propaganda,
especially in exposure to youth and to international public
opinion. In early August 2006, Ahmadinejad launched his personal
multilingual online journal. During the special ceremony that
was held for the occasion, the president promised to dedicate "five
minutes per week to write in his weblog." Yet as of this
writing, as he himself has admitted, urgent matters of the
state have kept him from frequent blogging.
As leading politicians have openly joined Weblogistan, the
authorities began endorsing religious and Koranic weblogs and
promoting their public exposure.[57] Seminary
students in Qom are
being trained to become active net users, develop Islamic software,
and expand Shi'a clerical transparency online.[58] In March 2006, the First International Koranic
Blogging Festival was launched in Iran with the intention
of increasing the leading and younger generation's study and
contemplation of Koranic and religious issues based on their
needs and interests.[59] In
recent years, various group weblogs have become more transparent
online with their vocal support of the Islamic
Republic and advancement of its Islamic message "against
satanic activism via computer networking."[60] Nonetheless, although the leadership is
directly or indirectly promoting these groups as bastions of
the Islamic Republic's future, they also pose an additional
challenge to the regime, as they are more familiar than other
laymen Iranians with the language of religion and Islamic religious
texts.
The embracing of the internet and later of Weblogistan by
the state's officials and leading clerics has made the Islamic
Republic more transparent for the Iranian public and the outside
world. It has managed to display some of Iran's
complexities and internal contradictions. Being clerics or
supporters of the Islamic Republic does not necessarily produce
unanimous voices. In that respect, personal weblogs and websites
are especially conducive in revealing an array of thoughts
and perceptions, even in issues of jurisprudence, among the
Iranian religious establishment.[61] Weblogistan has become a channel through which
these different voices can be heard as well. One case in point
is a weblog calling for the release of Ayatollah Sayed Hossein
Kazemeyni Boroujerdi over concerns for his deteriorating health
condition. Ayatollah Kazemeyni Boroujerdi was supposedly charged
in February 2007 with "acting against state security" by
advocating the separation of religion from the political basis
of the Iranian state.[62]
CONCLUSION
Weblogistan, similar to the blogosphere in particular and
the global inter-connective cyber-sphere in general, is still
a relatively new and highly dynamic phenomenon that has not
yet run its full course. Constant growth of internet accessibility,
technological evolution, and changing policies towards the
medium have far-reaching effects over patterns of social behavior
online, which are difficult to predict.
Nonetheless, weblogging has already had a revolutionary effect
on the mainstream media and on global interactions. Iran, similar to other Middle Eastern and African
countries, such as Egypt, Syria,
and Tunisia, is aspiring to expand the country's
telecommunications services as well as to develop its economy
through the use of new technologies. At the same time, these
countries are operating rigorously to respond to the challenges
of information and communications technology, such as Weblogistan's
rapid development. Considering the country's unique demography,
the future of the Islamic Republic depends upon its ability
to balance these policies.
*Dr.
Liora Hendelman-Baavur is a Research Fellow at the Center
for Iranian Studies and a lecturer at
the Department of Middle Eastern and African History, both
at Tel Aviv University. She is also co-editor of Iran-Pulse and
continues to research the social and political implications
of new communication technologies in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Her upcoming book focuses on Modernizing
Genders in Iranian Popular Culture from 1963 to 1979.
NOTES
[1] According to Technorati's State of the Live Web Report for
April 2007, the leading languages in terms of blog posting
volume are Japanese (37 percent), English (36 percent), and
Chinese (eight percent). See: http://technorati.com/weblog/2007/04/328.html.
See also: Kyumars Sheykh Esmaili, Mohsen Jamali, Mahmood
Neshati, Hassan Abolhassani, and Yasaman Soltan-Zadeh, "Experiments
on Persian Weblogs." (Tehran: Sharif University of Technology,
2006), submitted to the WWW2006 Workshop on Weblogging Ecosystem,
Edinburgh, May 2006, http://www.blogpulse.com/www2006-workshop/papers/persian-weblogs.pdf,
and Technorati's October 2006 report: http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000443.html.
[4] This review is based on ongoing research focusing on the social
and political implications of new communication technologies
in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
[6] The term "weblog" was introduced in 1997. It is attributed
to the American blogger Jorn Barger.
[7] Nasrin Alavi, We Are Iran: The Persian Blogs (NY: Soft Skull Press,
2005), p. 1.
[8] Alireza Doostdar, "The Vulgar Spirit of Blogging: On Language,
Culture, and Power in Persian Weblogestan," American
Anthropologist, Vol. 106, No. 4 (December 2004), p. 651.
[9] Erin Simmons, The Impact of the Weblog: A Case Study of the
United States and Iran, Senior thesis presented in
the Political Science Department at the Undergraduate Colleges
of the Ohio State University (June 2005), p. 2.
[10] Dan Gilmore, We the Media: Grassroots Journalism
by the People, for the People (Sebastopol:
O'Reilly Media, 2004), p. 28-29.
[13] Suzanne Stefanac, Dispatches from Blogistan:
A Travel Guide for the Modern Blogger (Thousand
Oaks: New Riders Press, 2006).
[15] Steve Fox, "The New Imagined Community:
Identifying and Exploring a Bidirectional Continuum Integrating
Virtual and Community Embodiment Model (CEM)," Journal
of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 1 (January 2004),
pp. 47-62.
[16] Michael Hauben and Ronda Hauben, Netizens: On the History and Impact of Usenet and the Internet (Los Alamitos: IEEE-Computer Society, 1997).
[17] For the extensive growth of the budget of the
Ministry of Post and Telecommunications see: Statistical
Center of Iran (SCI), 2004-2005, http://eamar.sci.org.ir.
[21] Azadeh Moaveni, Lipstick Jihad: A Memoir of
Growing Up Iranian in America and
American in Iran (NY:
Public Affairs, 2005), pp. 127-28.
[22] Abbas William Samii, "The Contemporary Iranian
News Media, 1998-1999," MERIA Journal,
Vol. 3, No. 4 (December 1999); Abbas William Samii, "Sisyphus'
Newsstand: The Iranian Press under Khatami," MERIA,
Vol. 5, No. 3 (September 2001), http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2001/issue3/jv5n3a1.html.
See also: The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), A
Worldwide Survey: Attacks on the Press in 2005, http://www.cpj.org/attacks05/mideast05/iran_05.html.
[23] Gholam Khiabany and Annabelle Sreberny, "The
Iranian Press and the Continuing Struggle Over Civil Society
1998-2000," International Communication Gazette,
Vol. 63, Nos. 2-3 (2001), pp. 203-23.
[26] The data collected for this paper is based on
Iranian WSPs' (Weblog Service Providers) general classification
for October 2006. However, since not all hosts present the
exact categorization, several topics (such as culture, history,
and art) were combined for purposes of unification. It is
important to note that figures presented by the four weblog
hosts that were checked tend to include both active and inactive
weblogs. They are also based on the initial categorization
of each weblog, which in some cases may change over time.
[29] In 1994, Iranian academic institutes joined the
global network, and in 1998, the Iranian National Academic
Network (INAN) was established, linking 230 scientific centers.
The same year 11 universities across the country initiated
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) departments.
For a detailed overview, see, for example: Ahmadreza Ashrafologhalaei, E-governance:
E-state in Iran:
Administrative Reform Plan (Tehran:
Management and Planning Organization, Bureau for Economic
Studies and International Cooperation, 2005), http://www.engagingcommunities2005.org/abstracts/S111-ashrafologhalaei-a.html.
[31] Alireza Doostdar has addressed yet another troubling
phenomenon connected with Weblogistan as a site that also
enables vulgar discussions, occasional use of aggressive
tones, and offensive biased remarks. See: Alireza Doostdar, "The
Vulgar Spirit of Blogging," pp. 651-62.
[32] The legislature considered ending the 1995 ban
on satellite dishes and receivers in 2001 and again in 2002.
Despite the ongoing ban and its arbitrary enforcement, satellite
dishes are very popular and are sold on the black market.
[33] Until 2006, the state had a monopoly over the
telecommunications market, with the exception of retail internet
service provision.
[34] The protest initiated a widely advertised online
campaign for "one million signatures demanding changes
in discriminatory laws," which aims to collect one million
signatures to advance reform in women and children's legal
rights. See: http://kosoof.com/archive/304.php.
[39] Hadi Ghaemi, "For Iran, The Man Is the Message," The New
York Times, June 29, 2006.
[43] Due to the use of various filtering software,
websites and weblogs that are blocked on one Iranian ISP
could be accessible on another.
[44] For a review on filtering technology with an
emphasis on the Iranian case, see: Villeneuve, "The
Filtering Matrix: Integrated Mechanisms of Information Control
and the demarcation of Borders in Cyberspace."
[45] Private ISPs must be approved by both the DCI
(Data Communication Company) and the Ministry of Culture
and Islamic Guidance.
[48] "It is Enemy's Tactic to Focus on Propagation
and Cultural Attack," February 16, 2006.
[50] Annabelle Sreberny-Mohammadi and Ali Mohammadi, Small
Media, Big Revolution (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota,
1994), p. 119.
[51] TAKFA is the acronym in Farsi of the "National
Information and Communication Technology Agenda."
[52] For details, see: http://www.takfa.ir/ and
also, Ahmadreza Ashrafologhalaei, "E-governance:
E-state in Iran:
Administrative Reform Plan," (Tehran:
Management and Planning Organization, Bureau for Economic
Studies and
International Cooperation, 2005), p. 1.
[57] Koranic weblogs are composed by at least three
main groups: those who focus on the meanings and interpretations
of Koranic verses, those who conduct research on the Koran,
and those who study the historical importance of the stories
mentioned in the Koran. Religious weblogs are dedicated to
issues pertaining to the daily ritual and moral practices
of Islam.
[60] One notable group is The Muslim Bloggers.
Another group is Khomeini's Offspring--bloggers dedicated
to continuing Khomeini's way and promoting his objectives.
[61] Elaine Sciolino, "Cleric Uses Weapon of
Religion Against Iran's
Rulers," New York Times, September 18, 2000.
[62] http://bameazadi8.blogfa.com/post-1.aspx.
MERIA Journal
Staff
Publisher and Editor: Prof. Barry Rubin
Assistant Editors: Cameron Brown, Yeru Aharoni, Yechiam Brot,
Deborah Touboul
MERIA is a project of the Global Research in International
Affairs (GLORIA) Center, Interdisciplinary University.
Site: http://meria.idc.ac.il -
Email: gloria@idc.ac.il
*Serving Readers Throughout the Middle East and in 100 Countries*
All material copyright MERIA Journal.
You must credit if
quoting and ask permission to reprint.
|